Data collection methods
What each method can tell you, how many participants you actually need, and the practical mistakes that damage datasets before analysis begins.
Data collection is where dissertations are won or lost, and the damage is usually invisible until analysis. A leading question, an unpiloted survey or a sample recruited from one seminar group cannot be fixed later. It is worth getting right at the point where it costs a day rather than a term.
Choosing a method
| Method | Good for | Weak at |
|---|---|---|
| Survey | Breadth, comparability, large samples | Depth, and anything you did not think to ask |
| Semi-structured interview | Depth, reasoning, the unexpected | Generalising, and time cost |
| Focus group | Interaction between views, norms | Sensitive topics, dominant voices |
| Observation | What people do rather than report | Motivation, and researcher effects |
| Experiment | Causal claims | Real-world validity |
| Existing documents or data | Scale, no recruitment, no ethics burden | Limited to what others recorded |
The gap between what people say and what they do is the single most useful thing to remember. Self-report measures beliefs about behaviour, not behaviour.
Surveys
Writing questions that work
Leading
How helpful did you find the new support service?
Neutral
How would you rate the new support service? (Very poor to very good)
Double-barrelled, unanswerable
Was the service quick and easy to use?
Split into two
How quickly were you seen? · How easy was the service to use?
Four more rules that catch most problems:
- Avoid absolutes such as always and never; almost nobody agrees with them
- Define vague terms: "regularly" means different things to different people
- Offer a neutral or "not applicable" option, or you force false answers
- Keep it short. Completion falls sharply past ten minutes
Sample size
Run a power calculation using G*Power, which is free. You need an expected effect size from similar studies, your alpha, usually 0.05, and your desired power, usually 0.80. The calculation tells you the minimum sample for a detectable effect.
"I recruited 43 because that is who responded" is not a justification. "A power calculation indicated 128 for a medium effect; 43 were recruited, so the study is underpowered and results are indicative" is honest and scores better.
Interviews
Building a topic guide
- Opening. Easy, factual, to settle the participant
- Core topics. Four to six, each with one main question and prompts
- Sensitive material. Placed later, once rapport exists
- Closing. "Is there anything I have not asked about that matters?" This question routinely produces the best data in the interview
Practical points that matter more than they sound
- Record with two devices. Recordings fail, and there is no second chance
- Allow an hour of transcription for every fifteen minutes of audio, or budget for a service
- Learn to leave silence. Participants fill it, and what they add is often the most useful material
- Write field notes immediately afterwards, while impressions are fresh
How many
Ten to fifteen is typical for a master's dissertation, six to ten for IPA. The principle is saturation: you stop when new interviews stop producing new themes. Say how you judged it rather than asserting the word.
Focus groups
Six to eight participants, sixty to ninety minutes. Useful when you want to see how views are negotiated between people rather than held individually.
- Avoid for sensitive topics, where people will not speak candidly in a group
- Avoid where participants have unequal power, such as staff and their managers together
- Plan for dominant voices: direct questions to quieter participants explicitly
- Transcription is harder because of overlapping speech; note who spoke as you go
Observation
| Type | Your role |
|---|---|
| Complete observer | Watching, not participating, and usually not noticed |
| Observer as participant | Present and known to be researching |
| Participant as observer | Taking part while openly researching |
| Complete participant | Fully embedded, role concealed. Rarely ethically approvable |
Decide your position in advance and record it, because it shapes what you can see and what participants will do while you are there.
Pilot everything
This is the most skipped step and the highest return. Two pilot interviews or ten pilot survey responses will show you which questions are ambiguous, which produce one-word answers, and how long it really takes.
Report the pilot in your methodology and say what you changed. It demonstrates rigour and costs a paragraph.
Ethics, in the real timeline
- Approval must be granted before any collection, with no exceptions
- Allow four to eight weeks, longer for vulnerable groups
- NHS research needs HRA approval on top of university approval, which can take months
- Prepare a participant information sheet, a consent form, and a data management plan
- Say how data will be stored, anonymised and eventually destroyed
Data collected before approval cannot be used, however good it is. Every year students discover this the expensive way.
Last updated: 30 July 2026 · Written by the AssignWise editorial team ·Spotted something wrong?
Frequently asked questions
Surveys, interviews, focus groups, observation, experiments, and analysis of existing documents or datasets. Which you use follows from your research question rather than from preference.
For qualitative interviews, ten to fifteen is typical for a dissertation, judged by whether new themes are still appearing. For quantitative work, run a power calculation. Never justify a number by saying it is what you managed to recruit.
A structured interview asks identical questions in the same order, which makes responses comparable. A semi-structured interview uses a topic guide but allows you to follow what emerges, which is why it dominates student research.
Yes, always, and almost nobody does. One or two pilot interviews or ten pilot survey responses will expose ambiguous questions before they contaminate your whole dataset. It costs a day and can save a project.
Any research involving human participants requires university ethics approval before collection begins, not after. Allow four to eight weeks. Research with children, patients, or other vulnerable groups takes longer and may need external approval.
Want a second pair of eyes on it?
Send us your document for a fixed, no-obligation quote. We reply within one working hour.
Get Your Free Quote